Analysis of the correspondence between endoscopy and histology in 135 pediatric esophagogastroduodenoscopies: a retrospective study

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To determine the level of correspondence between endoscopic and histological data when performing esophagogastroduodenoscopie (EGD) in children. A secondary aim was to identify predictors that affect the correspondence between endoscopy and histology.

Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the EGD (patients aged 2–18 years) was carried out. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used to determine the level of agreement and potential predictors of agreement between endoscopy and histology.

Results. 135 EGDS were analyzed. The overall level of disagreement between endoscopy and histology was 39.3% (53 patients). Taken into account histology as the gold standard, the specificity of white light EGD was 45.3%, sensitivity, accuracy, positive and its negative predictive value was 80, 60,7, 53,9, 73,9% respectively. A comparison of endoscopic and histological conclusions for each upper GI organ showed that the collection of biopsies for histological examination in all children improves the diagnostic value of white light EGD by 33.3% in the esophagus, 41.5% in the stomach and 14% in the duodenum. Logistic regression analysis showed that only heartburn and belching turned out to be a statistically significant (p=0.018) predictor of a low degree of correspondence between endoscopic and histological results (OR 0.302, 95% CI 0.112–0.814). Abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, an established diagnosis of IBD, the presence of a diagnosis of JRA, age, gender, experience of an endoscopist and endoscope model did not have a statistically significant effect on the agreement level between endoscopy and histology (p>0.05).

Conclusion. EGD as an instrumental intervention is by definition an invasive procedure, and its diagnostic potential should be used to the maximum through the performance of routine biopsies in all children. This is especially important for pediatric gastroenterology because it allows not only to improve the effectiveness of intraluminal diagnostic method by almost 40%, but also to reduce the number of repeated unproductive white light EGD’s without taking tissue for confirming or refuting the presence of the disease in the child.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Anton A. Shavrov

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: shavrovnczd@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0178-2265

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Department Head

Russian Federation, Moscow

Sultanbek I. Ibragimov

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: shavrovnczd@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6651-8249

endoscopist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexander S. Tertychnyy

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: shavrovnczd@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5635-6100

Sci. (Med.), Prof.

Russian Federation, Moscow

Dmitry A. Morozov

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: shavrovnczd@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1940-1395

Sci. (Med.), Prof.

Russian Federation, Moscow

Andrey A. Shavrov

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: shavrovnczd@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3666-2674

Sci. (Med.), Prof.

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Anastasia Yu. Kharitonova

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: shavrovnczd@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6218-3605

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Department Head

 

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anastasia O. Merkulova

Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Email: shavrovnczd@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8623-0947

endoscopist, Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Панфилова В.Н., Королев М.П., Шавров А.А. (мл.), и др. Детская эндоскопия. Методические рекомендации. СПб. 2020 [Panfilova V.N., Korolev M.P., Shavrov A.A., i dr. Detskaia endoskopiia. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Saint Petersburg. 2020 (in Russian)].
  2. Шавров А.А. (мл.), Харитонова А.Ю., Шавров А.А., Морозов Д.А. Современные методы эндоскопической диагностики и лечения болезней верхнего отдела пищеварительного тракта у детей. Вопросы современной педиатрии. 2015;14(4):497-502 [Shavrov AA (Jr.), Kharitonova AYu, Shavrov AA, Morozov DA. Modern Methods of Endoscopic Diagnostics and Treatment for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Diseases in Pediatrics. Current Pediatrics. 2015;14(4):497-502 (in Russian)] doi: 10.15690/vsp.v14.i4.1389
  3. Dahshan A, Rabah R. Correlation of endoscopy and histology in the gastroesophageal mucosa in children: are routine biopsies justified? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;31(3):213-6. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200010000-00005
  4. Black DD, Haggitt RC, Whitington PF. Gastroduodenal endoscopic-histologic correlation in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988;7(3):353-8. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198805000-00007
  5. Oderda G, Forni M, Farina L, et al. Duodenitis in children: clinical, endoscopic, and pathological aspects. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987;33(5):366-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(87)71640-x
  6. Шавров А.А. (мл.), Волынец Г.В., Шавров А.А., и др. Оптическая биопсия в диагностике изменений слизистой оболочки желудка и двенадцатиперстной кишки у детей. Доктор.Ру. Гастроэнтерология. 2016;1(118):19-23 [Shavrov AA (Jr.), Volynets GV, Shavrov AA, et al. Optical Biopsy in Detecting Changes in Gastric and Duodenal Mucosa. Doctor.Ru. Gastroenterology. 2016;1(118):19-23 (in Russian)].
  7. Lombardi G, de’ Angelis G, Rutigliano V, et al. Reflux oesophagitis in children; the role of endoscopy. A multicentric Italian survey. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39(9):864-71. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2007.05.018
  8. Elitsur Y, Raghuverra A, Sadat T, Vaid P. Is gastric nodularity a sign for gastric inflammation associated with Helicobacter pylori infection in children? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30(3):286-8. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200004000-00016
  9. ASGE Standards OF Practice Committee; Lee KK, Anderson MA, Baron TH, et al. Modifications in endoscopic practice for pediatric patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.008
  10. Kori M, Gladish V, Ziv-Sokolovskaya N, et al. The significance of routine duodenal biopsies in pediatric patients undergoing upper intestinal endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;37(1):39-41. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200307000-00011
  11. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Lightdale JR, Acosta R, Shergill AK, et al; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Modifications in endoscopic practice for pediatric patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(5):699-710. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.014
  12. Hummel TZ, ten Kate FJ, Reitsma JB, et al. Additional value of upper GI tract endoscopy in the diagnostic assessment of childhood IBD. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(6):753-7. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318243e3e3
  13. Tringali A, Thomson M, Dumonceau JM, et al. Pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Guideline Executive summary. Endoscopy. 2017;49(1):83-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111002
  14. Thakkar K, Dorsey F, Gilger MA. Impact of endoscopy on management of chronic abdominal pain in children. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(2):488-93. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1315-1
  15. Thakkar K, Chen L, Tessier ME, Gilger MA. Outcomes of children after esophagogastroduodenoscopy for chronic abdominal pain. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(6):963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.041
  16. Sheiko MA, Feinstein JA, Capocelli KE, Kramer RE. Diagnostic yield of EGD in children: a retrospective single-center study of 1000 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78(1):47-54.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.168
  17. Gilger MA, Gold BD. Pediatric endoscopy: new information from the PEDS-CORI project. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2005;7(3):234-9. doi: 10.1007/s11894-005-0040-y
  18. Sheiko MA, Feinstein JA, Capocelli KE, Kramer RE. The concordance of endoscopic and histologic findings of 1000 pediatric EGDs. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.010
  19. Scomparin RC, Lourencao PLTA, Comes GT, et al. Are biopsies always necessary in upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in children? A retrospective 10-year analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180(4):1089-1098. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03838-7
  20. Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabó I, et al. European Society Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Guidelines for Diagnosing Coeliac Disease 2020. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;70(1):141-56. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002497
  21. Papadopoulou A, Koletzko S, Heuschkel R, et al; ESPGHAN Eosinophilic Esophagitis Working Group and the Gastroenterology Committee. Management guidelines of eosinophilic esophagitis in childhood. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58(1):107-18. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a80be1

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 74329 от 19.11.2018 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies